I haven't read Christopher Hitchens' recent book, God is not Great:
How Religion Poisons Everything, yet its title compels me to present an
opinion for discussion.
Religion has two faces: one unites and the other divides. Religion
unifies people into communities and simultaneously divides by building
tight boundaries around them.
Religion generally is founded upon one reality underlying the entire
universe. This reality is infinite. It is the one source of all diverse
beings. It is indescribable. Itself beyond attribution, it is the source
of all attributes. This is the unitive face. It represents core
spirituality. Spirit, unlike material, is all inclusive. It
unequivocally declares the essential oneness of all created beings. It
is the root of our ability to perceive equality. This face of religion
is nectar of love, life and justice.
Now examine the divisive face.
Having given one infinite reality, religion goes on to confine it in
finite forms, in words or otherwise. Describing the indescribable in
particular ways, religion identifies the underlying reality with its
respective form. The form becomes the God. Suddenly, somebody's God
becomes less Godlike, somebody's prophet less prophetic or un-prophetic,
and somebody's community less righteous and deserving.
In its drive to distinguish communities and demarcate territories,
religion implicitly and explicitly encourages divisive thinking. This
face not only sets communities apart but against each other and is
toxic, insidious and downright poisonous.
Strong religious identities may be harmless within homogenous
communities, but they are known to cause havoc between them.
We live in a pluralistic secular democracy. Secularism requires the
citizens of our country, its social structures, support systems, and all
levels of government to be equidistant from or equally respectful to all
religions and all people. Religious identities must be balanced against
the responsibility of equal respect, heartfelt and not merely
superficial. Are we capable of it? Are we genuinely teaching and
encouraging it in our youth?
Democracy is very spiritual in its recognition of our underlying
oneness which is foundational to equal rights. Rights demand
responsibility. What is needed for our responsibility: core spirituality
by itself or multi-faced religion as it is? Can religion discard the
divisive face and fully embrace its core spirituality?
Inability to perceive equality threatens pluralistic societies. The
best we can then hope for is an uneasy peace; and history is proof that
uneasy peace is easily broken.
We need to enrich and expand our identity. Let us not be so fearful
about losing our religious identity that we isolate ourselves and shy
away from building bridges to survive in pluralistic societies or a
pluralistic global village that the world is fast becoming.
We must wholeheartedly adopt the unitive face of religion. We must
discard the divisive one in our lives and in educating our children.
Otherwise, the sustainability of everything inter-religious or
pluralistic, including dialogues, marriages or democracies, is
threatened.
Originally
published at http://news.therecord.com/article/214121