Education for Inclusive
Identities and Oneness
ShivD. Talwar
This article addresses the problem of intolerance. It suggests that intolerance in general and
that of religious differences in particular can be handled through formal
education in our educational institutions by building identities inclusive of
all human beings, if not of all beings in the universe. It argues that the concept of ultimate
reality provides the harmonizing tool necessary for building such
identities.
Human history abounds in instances of religion being used
by powerful political and economic forces for achieving their goals usually at
the cost of immense violence, pain, and misery. Religions themselves, through misdirected institutional loyalty
and human condition (Talwar 2004), have acquiesced in being exploited by
internal and external divisive forces.
Today, modern technology has incomparably enhanced the
power of these divisive forces. Instant
communication and fast transportation have made the world into what is likened
to a global village. At the same time,
modern weapons have immensely increased the scope of mass destruction. As a result, alliances of the religious with
the political, economic and other divisive forces have never been
deadlier. There is an urgent need to
attenuate human condition to prevent the formation of these deadly alliances.
Recent history has amply demonstrated the need of taking
effective steps in guiding humanity in positive directions not only by
preventing the divisive use of religion, but also by promoting its legitimate
role of uniting humanity.
Spirituality being the awareness of the underlying unity
of all beings in the universe, raising spiritual consciousness through the use
of systematic education is expected to help build inclusive identities leading
to mutual tolerance, understanding, love and respect. It is argued that the intelligibility resulting from
systematically enhanced spiritual awareness will enable self-management of
human condition not only in preventing the formation of divisive alliances
involving religion, but also in preventing the prevalent excessive exploitation
of natural resources and the human environment.
There exists a vast body of didactic knowledge in the
spiritual heritage of humanity. It is
proposed to use this body of knowledge harmoniously as the basis of educational
curricula at different levels in our academic institutions. It is argued that
this effort will promote religious inclusivity preventing the use of religion
by the divisive forces as an instrument of hate and destruction. It is further argued that it is possible to
be exclusive in following the path of one’s personal salvation or liberation
while being inclusive in respecting others in their respective paths. Being faithful to one’s religion and being
reasonable, sensitive and considerate to others is not mutually exclusive;
rather it is a behavior, which is a matter of intelligibility based on
systematic learning; and pluralistic societies cannot afford to leave this
learning to occur by chance.
Admittedly, the suggested approach is long-term. Different strategies may suit better for
short-term containment of the tragic and symptomatic events such as September
11, 2001, the likes of which will never be eliminated even in a thousand years
and the world would never truly be a global village without deeper
consciousness raising efforts such as the one proposed in this article.
This article uses the word spirit to mean essence. As applied to a human being this word means
the vital animating, conscious, intelligent and usually non-physical essence of
being a human. As applied to the
universe, it would mean that subtle essence that underlies the entire
perceptible universe. Since a human being
is also a part of the universe, it is easy to imagine that the essence of the
human has some kind of a relationship with the essence of the universe. Since the underlying essence expresses
through the physical, a study of the spiritual would also involve the
connection and the interaction between the two.
For the purposes of education, the spiritual heritage of
humanity would thus be defined as that body of didactic knowledge established
by sages, seers, saints, philosophers, theologians, psychologists, natural
scientists, life scientists and social scientists, and common people alike who
have invested their lifetimes researching matters of human and universal
essence. Since various experts view
such matters from different vantage points, this knowledge is inherently varied
and multi-disciplined. Harmonization of
different points of view of various peoples and disciplines is necessary
towards the intelligibility required for developing inclusive attitudes. This article argues that the concept of ultimate
reality provides the best tool available for achieving the desired
harmonization.
Nothing can come out of nothing. The fact of existence of the universe points to the existence of
an ultimate cause or an ultimate reality that is the causal source of all
beings. The ultimate reality is
considered to be both the efficient and the material cause of the
universe. It is the source of all existence. It is defined as that out of which this
universe is born at the beginning of time, in which this universe is sustained
and into which this universe dissolves at the end of time (Sivananda 1999, p.
16).
Everything, all entities, all beings, all emotions, all
principles, all elements, and all ideas in the entire universe can be explained
and understood, without recourse to any other entity, in terms of the ultimate
reality of the universe. At the same time, there is nothing, no entity, no
being, no emotion, no principle, no element, and no idea in the entire universe
in terms of which ultimate reality can be explained and understood. Terms such as the transcendent, the
universal principle, and the universal spirit are equivalent. The universe is
considered to be a manifestation of the creative power of the transcendent,
variously referred to as Godhead, God without, or simply God.
By its very definition, the concept of ultimate reality
provides the tool that has the capacity to affect the desired harmonization
between religions and between religion and other disciplines.
Since its effect, the universe, is infinite it is
generally agreed that its cause, ultimate reality too is infinite. The principle of ultimate reality is
infinite in its scope since it embraces all things in the universe without any exception,
whatsoever. The cause of the universe,
its ultimate reality is infinite and so is the universe that is born of
it. Having given birth to the infinite
universe does not diminish the infinity of the reality that remains outside of
it. Any part of infinity is infinite
and so is also the remainder (Ranganatharanda, 1993, p. 63).
The fact that there is nothing in the entire universe in
terms of which the ultimate reality of the universe can be understood points
towards the uniqueness of ultimate reality.
It is the only one of its kind without a second. In spite of the fact that humanity variously
labels it (as God, Godhead, Allah, Brahman, Shunya, Tao, etc.), variously
understand it and variously describe it, all great religions and
philosophies of the world proclaim that it is one without a second. The principle of oneness of it is generally
accepted.
Because of its uniqueness, positive definitions fail to
fully describe the ultimate reality.
Some authorities consider it better to describe it in negative terms
such as “not this, not that” (Hume 1921, Brihadaranyaka Upanishad p.97, p.125,
p.132; Copplestone 1955, p.131).
Cognitively, we can only approximate towards it by employing negative
descriptions and thereby hope to gain some understanding about its nature
(Ibid., p136).
The root of all knowledge lies in experience through sense
perception. Cognitive knowledge is
descriptive in nature and its base is the conative or experiential
knowledge. We use inner tools of
reason, memory and intellect to express our experience in words, numbers, and
similar devices. Sense perception is
the tool of experiencing a physical object.
Experience of any object is overwhelming and indescribable. Cognitive knowledge gained without direct
experience is without conviction and incomplete. One may read or listen to all kinds of descriptions of sugar but
this knowledge is incomplete and unsure without a direct experience of sugar
itself. Once sugar is seen, felt and
tasted and its experience verified by its prior understanding, one’s knowledge
of sugar becomes sure and complete.
Although senses are known to deceive at times, the repeatability and
reproducibility of sense experience makes them the best knowledge tools in
humankind’s toolkit.
Sugar is a simple object well within the field of sense
perception. In the case of complex
objects, ideas and principles outside the reach of sense perception whatsoever,
mind and intellect are the only tools of experiencing, and these tools are not
as reliable as sense perception.
Ultimate reality is such a principle.
Its complexity is enormous because of the infinity of its scope. Senses can only enable an indirect
experience of it through that of a vast variety of its manifestations. Its cognitive understanding is based either
on sense perception of its manifestations in which case it is indirect, or on
direct experience through inner tools of mind and intellect, which are less
reliable than even the senses. Although
their rigor and approaches differ, philosophy and the natural sciences use the
indirect approach, whereas the discipline known as ‘mysticism’, which in the
opinion of the author is rather a dismissive term, uses the direct approach.
This situation highlights the limitation of human mind and
its linguistic convention to completely encompass a principle like ultimate
reality and it presents a real problem with conviction and reliability of one’s
understanding and knowledge of ultimate reality. The best one can do is to rely collectively on philosophy and
science that attempt to unravel ultimate reality indirectly through a rigorous
study of nature – physical manifestation of ultimate reality, and mysticism
that attempts to unravel ultimate reality directly through an equally rigorous
study of it. It must, however be kept
in mind that such knowledge is cognitive knowledge and cognitive knowledge
gained without personal experience is still without conviction and thus,
incomplete. Although both the cognitive
and conative are rooted in reality, one needs personal conative knowledge, both
direct and indirect, to develop conviction and a degree of confidence to lead
one’s life in harmony with one’s knowledge of ultimate reality, for knowledge
is meaningless if not applied in real life.
One can study the findings of philosophy, science and
mysticism; they are available as published material available through formal
education and self-study. The big question is how to obtain this experiential
knowledge. Life is too short and
personal resources too meager to study the vast manifestation of ultimate
reality rigorously as science does; the only approach available to an
individual is to supplement cognitive intelligibility by a personal affective
and philosophical appreciation of nature.
Everyone has personal resources for attempting the direct conative
knowledge of ultimate reality. In view
of the fact that ultimate reality is best described in negative terms as “not
this, not that”, it is said that ceasing to seek the descriptive and cognitive
is the beginning of the direct conative - “The Tao which can be spoken is not
the eternal Tao” (Watts 1989, p.16); “So
I say that a man should be set free of his own knowing as he was when he was
not” (Eckhart 1981, p. 201); “But the higher part of contemplation, insofar as
it is possible to possess it here below, consists entirely in this darkness and
in this cloud of unknowing, with a loving impulse and a dark gazing into the
simple being of God himself alone” (The Cloud 1981, p. 137).
How does the mystic arrive at a direct knowledge of
ultimate reality? He/she uses methods
of contemplation combined with rigorous personal disciplines. A study of the different methods of
contemplation suggests that there is a commonality and it lies in emptying the
mind of all ideas about ultimate reality or any other object of contemplation
and surrendering it to let the reality reveal itself (Talwar 2004; Taimni 1961,
pp.6-10; The Cloud of Unknowing 1981, pp.118-19). The process of emptying the mind of all ideas or stopping all
modifications of the mind involves exhausting and quieting the intellect by
uninterrupted contemplation of ultimate reality or any one particular
issue. In this state, intellect is
transcended, all intellectual processes cease and the contemplators mind is
open to intuition or revelation by the reality of the object of
contemplation. The intuition or
revelation received in this transcendent state is a personal experience of the
individual seeker who is well advised to verify it using valid methods of
knowledge verification (perception, reason and authoritative testimony)
available to humankind. It is hard to
describe the contemplative experience for common knowledge. How do you describe an intimate personal
experience? Human descriptions of any
experience, howsoever complete, are yet limited because of the limitations of
human linguistic conventions. Whatever
descriptions are available are couched in personal and cultural expressions. Common listening and reading without the aid
of reflection and deep meditation fails to harmonize the available
descriptions.
It must be emphasized that both the cognitive and the
conative being rooted in reality are complimentary to each other. One needs the conative to gain conviction
and confidence for practical use of the acquired knowledge and the one needs
the cognitive to verify the conative.
Because valid knowledge is rooted in reality, there can be no conflict
between the conative, cognitive, direct and indirect.
Human curiosity impels us to want to know and understand
the nature of everything. Ultimate
reality too is not excluded from the probing of our curiosity. But, because of its infinite scope, we may
differ amongst ourselves as to its nature.
We are like the proverbial blind men in the parable of the blind men and
the elephant describing the nature of the elephant from their respective touch
and feel (Felleman 1936, p.521).
How do you know and describe the infinite reality that
underlies the birth, sustenance and dissolution of all beings in the
universe? Human perception, reasoning
and intellect do not seem to be enough for knowing it. We are advised to refer to the scriptural
knowledge resulting from the contemplative visions of the seers and sages who
have spent their lifetimes researching the nature of this reality (Sivananda
1999, p. 19). Since all knowledge is
rooted in reality, scientific knowledge must also be considered in addition to
the scriptural knowledge as the valid basis of an overall understanding of
ultimate reality. This body of
scriptural and scientific knowledge differs in its revelations about the nature
of the ultimate reality. We are advised
to harmonize the different understandings resulting from different studies
(Ibid., p. 20). An understanding
resulting from this harmonization may still be personal and private and merely
point to the ultimate reality rather than definitely describe it.
An exact definition of infinity is impossible. We simply attempt to describe the cause of
infinite potential in terms of a finite effect or a group of finite effects,
while there is nothing in the entire universe in terms of which the infinite
ultimate reality of the universe can be understood and described.
Some of us think that the ultimate reality is a person and
ascribe to it all qualities that we consider good and auspicious for a
person. Some of us think that this
ultimate person is a male and some think it is a female, while others think
that it has both the genders. Some of
us think it is impersonal. Some of us
think it is devoid of all attributes, while others think it has all the
attributes we can think all. Some
consider it to have a form; some consider it to be formless, while others
consider it formless and yet capable of all forms. Some of us think it is pointless to think about knowing ultimate
reality because man does not possess the cognitive tools to discern it; it
being unknowable, what is the point in talking about it? They feel humanity should concern itself
with improving human condition and let ultimate reality to itself.
Only infinity can evoke such diverse feelings and appear
so very differently to different people and all are equally right or equally
wrong in describing it in their various ways.
And yet we use our understanding as the only valid understanding and we
get ready for all kinds of physical and emotional violence when others disagree
with our vision!
The difficulties of definite descriptions of ultimate
reality do not deter human minds from attempting general understandings
howsoever vague they may be. One such
understanding that is generally common in religious circles is the idea of
consciousness of ultimate reality. The
birth of the universe is generally considered to be a conscious and willed
act. It may even be a deliberate and
planned act - “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and
the Word was God” (The Holy Bible, John 1:1), “No, my son, in the beginning
there was existence alone – One only, without a second. He, the One, thought to himself: Let me be
many, let me grow forth” (Prabhavananda, Chandogya Upanishad, p.109), and “We
created not the heavens and the earth, and all that is between them just for a
mere play” (The Noble Qur’an, 21:16); or it may be a spontaneous yet conscious
act – “The Tao’s principle is spontaneity” (Watt 1989, p. 17). In addition, there are many assertions in human
scripture that attribute to it the power of consciousness such as in
omniscience, mercy, compassion, knowledge, thinking, etc. Another power that is commonly attributed to
it in all religious circles is its subtlety.
It is considered to be purely spiritual and non-material yet underlying all
materiality, pervasive to the extent of omnipresence, and capable of working
all kinds of miracles to the extent of omnipotence. Thus, the principles of consciousness and materiality (primordial
nature) are its first manifestations.
We are conscious and we have physicality. We can only get them from our spiritual
cause if it has them in potential form.
The effect cannot have what the cause does not possess. Thus goes the logic in ascribing the
potential of consciousness and materiality to our ultimate reality. Yet there are others who consider it
distasteful to bring ultimate reality into the domain of divisive human logic
that classifies in order to understand.
They simply consider ultimate reality to have a mystical power, called maya,
to manifest itself as diverse and finite principles, beings, forms and events
in relation to each other, whereas in actuality there is no duality let alone
multiplicity in nature (Watts 1989, pp. 38-43).
According to Taoism, to which Zen Buddhism is similar in a
fundamental way (Watts 1989, p. 3), all beings of the universe are mere
manifestations of ultimate reality called Tao. Two opposite principles called yin and yang are the
first manifestations of Tao. The
first principles are interdependent on each other, though opposite in character
are not in conflict but creatively cooperate with each other in manifesting the
underlying reality as the diverse universe.
Yin is the passive female principle representing darkness, cold,
death and earth whereas yang the active male principle associated with
light, warmth, life and heaven. Yin
is divided into an indefinite number of evil spirits or particles called kwei
and yang into good spirits called shen. Shen derived from heaven, immaterial and ethereal
constitutes human intellect and virtue, while kwei, derived from
material earth represents human passions and vice (Soothill 1923, pp.127-28).
According to Indian philosophy as well, ultimate reality
called Brahman, manifests at first as two principles - the principle of
consciousness as the active male principle called purusha (spirit), and
the passive principle of materiality as the female principle called prakriti
(energy, primordial nature). Purusha
is the changeless principle, while prakriti is ever changing and evolving. Changeless purusha acts as a
catalyst, the presence of which is essential for the process of evolution of prakriti. Both purusha and prakriti are
inseparable aspects of ultimate reality considered as separate principles only
for the sake of understanding. While purusha
may be considered as the efficient cause, prakriti is the material cause
of the universe. Prakriti
further evolves into two classes of principles - subtle internal psychic
principles or the principles of subjectivity such as intellect, individuality,
mind, senses etc. and the gross external principles of objectivity or the
principles of physicality that comprise the external world perceived by the
cognitive senses (Talwar 2001).
Although purusha is seen more clearly through the principles of
subjectivity in animate beings, all beings, animate and inanimate, are
manifestations of both purusha and prakriti, and neither one of
them has any separate existence without the other.
In the philosophy of the Abrahamic family of religions, a
distinction is made between the created and the uncreated worlds. The created world encompasses the domain of
nature, or energy and the uncreated world encompasses the world of pure spirit.
In the realm of the created world, the heaven and the
earth are the two first principles that God created - “In the beginning, God
created the heaven and the earth” (The Holy Bible, Genesis 1:1). “In the beginning” means in the
principle. “A principle is something
that is in or with that of which it is the principle even though it does not
precede it temporally” (Eckhart 1981, p. 88) and “Creation is the conferring of
existence” (Ibid., p. 87). The
principle of heaven is the active principle of form or inner existence and the
principle of earth means the passive principle of matter or physical existence
(Ibid., pp. 90-91). The principles of
heaven and earth function through intellect, and encompass the whole of nature
and soul. The soul borders on nature
(Ibid., p. 84) and is the most perfect among all the forms of matter (Ibid., p.
87).
In the uncreated world of pure spirit, that Eckhart calls
the Godhead, are the trinity of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. “God from God, light from light, one light,
one God”, “These three are one”, (Ibid., p. 96). The Holy Spirit is the efficient cause and the created principles
the material cause of the universe. God
arranges suitable accidents for everything in heaven and earth to appear
appropriately (Ibid., p. 89). The Holy
Spirit is the principle of consciousness.
The realm of the created world is devoid of consciousness, which is
manifest in nature due to the Holy Spirit in spirit matter combination -
"In him was light; and the life was the light of men" (The Holy
Bible, John 1:4); "And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness
comprehended it not" (Ibid., John 1:5).
In this article, a reference to the principle of
materiality generically or by any name includes a reference to the created
principles of heaven and earth, prakriti and yin; and any
reference to the principle of consciousness generically or by any name includes
a reference to the Holy Spirit, purusha and yang.
The principle of consciousness, being unchangeable, is
also known as the principle of being.
In the same way, the principle of materiality changing constantly is
also known as the principle of becoming.
Being and becoming are consistent with the observed facts of the
universe and every being in the universe remaining the same and, at the same
time, being subject to incessant change at every instant.
Until recently, physics used to think that various kinds
of elemental atoms were the building blocks of the diverse universe. That was thought to be the case when atoms
were thought to be indivisible, although it was known that atoms consisted of
particles such as electrons, neutrons, and protons. The number of electrons and protons in an atom determine the
element to which the atom belonged. Cell,
the building block of life, was considered to be the result of a combination of
suitable atoms under right conditions.
Physics speculates that consciousness, which in the opinion of the
author is outside the scope of physics, results merely from lifeless and
insentient atoms when they combine under certain conditions conducive to create
life.
Then, came a time when it was demonstrated that atoms,
which were so far considered to be indivisible building blocks of matter, and
their hereto before known constituent particles can in fact be split further
into yet subtler fundamental particles releasing an enormous amount of
energy. With this demonstration, matter
just became a ‘frozen’ form of energy.
The concept of energy has replaced matter as the most central concept in
physics today (Berezin 2002).
Although, physics today considers energy to be the
ultimate principle of all materiality, one must marvel at the arrangement of
fundamental particles into the constituent atomic particles and the forces that
propel them into various arrangements of orbits, which enable them to appear as
diverse matter. If energy is the
material cause of matter, then the forces that control and organize the
energy-based development must be credited with being the efficient cause.
Individual subatomic particles are very heavy in
comparison to their size. If one could
pack them tight with no inter-particle spaces, a teaspoon full of them will
weigh a few thousand tons. A
teaspoonful of them can expand into a small planet.
Where did energy that became ‘frozen’ as matter come
from? Science theorizes that it came
out of a black hole in a big bang or some such mysterious way at the birth of
the universe that has been expanding since inception. The process of dissolution begins with the contraction of the
universe and final disappearance back into a black hole simply by the force of
gravity. The black holes are very dense
and heavy and so becomes the contracted universe immediately prior to its
dissolution.
According to the mystical and metaphysical thinking,
individual beings are comprised of a physical body composed of earthly elements
and an inner being composed of the heavenly elements. The elements are held together in a harmonious fashion by the
causal force of Holy Spirit. It is the
Holy Spirit that enlivens the inner being, which in turn enlivens the physical
being. Different types of beings are
different because of differences in physical bodies that permit the inner
functions to intercommunicate to different extent. The difference in an animal and a human is that in the human body
the nature of the physical body permits inner functions to intercommunicate
with each other and with the physical body in an optimal fashion. The difference between an animate and an
inanimate being would similarly be explained by minimal channels for the inner
functions to intercommunicate between each other and with the physical body in
an inanimate being. The strength of
intercommunication between inner functions and between the inner functions and
the external body determines the extent of spiritual development. According to mystical and metaphysical
thinking, it is intelligence that guides all evolution and developmental
activities in the domain of nature.
Physical thinking credits energy to somehow arrange a
number of subatomic particles into an elemental atom. Different atoms arrange themselves into an inanimate being, or a
living cell in favorable environment, which in turn becomes the building block
of life. All living beings are
particular arrangements of cells.
Consciousness somehow develops when life develops. Ultimately all beings, animate and
inanimate, are nothing but a bunch of quarks arranged in particular
fashions. The force that shapes these
arrangements does not seem to be within the scope of physics.
Irrespective of whether one subscribes to mystical and
metaphysical point of view or to the point of view of physics, there is a
certain feeling of kinship, unity and oneness amongst the infinite diversity in
the universe that we cannot escape:
1.
In the physical point of view, the source of underlying
kinship, unity and oneness is energy, which transforms into the fundamental
subatomic particles. All elements and
all beings are typical arrangements of underlying energy. If the energy is the material cause of
being, the mysterious force that arranges energy in diverse patterns is the
efficient cause. There is a level of
unity at the efficient level in addition to one at the material level. An individual being is not completely finite
and disjointed from others. The
underlying force that arranges energy particles in diverse patterns forming an
individual is also responsible for inter-connection of individual beings in the
universe. Any event that happens to an
individual has to affect others through the medium of this inter-connection.
2.
In the case of the religious and metaphysical point of view,
we are united both through the unity of the so-called created principles and we
are united through the unity of the so-called uncreated Holy Spirit. There are two levels of unity at the created
level. At the physical level, we are
united through the earthly elements that comprise our bodies. At the inner subjective level, we are united
through the heavenly elements that comprise our minds and intellects. At the spiritual and the causal level, we
are united through the Holy Spirit.
The concept of one ultimate reality does not lend itself
to a distinction between the created and the uncreated. It harmonizes them both into a single
concept. There is only one ultimate
reality that expresses itself into two and then into many. By definition, this one is both the
efficient and the material cause of both matter and spirit that appear as
diverse beings in the universe.
We are united in oneness not only through ultimate reality
as our source of birth, but also through it being the source of our
sustenance. We, the air we breathe, the
water we drink, the food we eat, the shelter in which we live, the cars we
drive, the televisions we watch for recreation and entertainment, the fuel that
drives our means of transportation, the electricity which runs our machines and
lights our houses, and so on all are expressions of one ultimate reality
through which we relate in kinship, unity and oneness with all beings.
As thinking beings it is up to us humans to use
responsibility and respect in our relationships not only between each other,
but also with the trees, plants, animals, fish, fowl, sun, moon, stars, earth,
water, air, etc. Above all, we are
united and one with each other as human beings in the sharing amongst us of an
additional level of unity. We are
co-travelers in of the journey of evolution from the principles first created
by ultimate reality. We owe each other
the utmost degree of understanding, love, and respect.
The fundamental source of our kinship, unity and oneness,
ultimate reality - the source of our origin and our sustenance must always stay
in our minds as we relate with each other and our environment.
An animate being has bodily needs for survival and
continuation of life. He/she needs air
to breathe, water to drink, food to eat and shelter to live in order to
continue the journey of life. In
addition, there are needs of procreation and pleasure to live well, enjoy and
continue life. These are immediate
needs and must be fulfilled in every case or life ceases to continue.
In the case of human beings, there are some needs upon
which our life does not apparently seem to depend. These needs are social and ethical in nature. We need to feel well by doing the right
thing and fitting in the society as we run a business to provide for survival
and pleasure. We follow a religion that
is indigenous to the society; we do what is expected of us in our diverse roles
as citizen, child, youth, husband, wife, father, mother, etc. In some cases, emphasis on immediate needs
of survival and pleasure hijack the need of doing the right thing, while in
others, ethical and social considerations take on such an importance that life
and pleasure are willingly sacrificed to protect a preconceived value
system. At times, this self-sacrifice
is propelled by positive feelings of love to save and protect, while at times
it is motivated by hatred and self-righteousness to damage and destroy others.
For some human beings, there is a need to know,
understand, and live in harmony with the profound truths of life. This need may supersede all other
needs. They want to discover and unravel
the secrets of nature and reality and travel the journey of their lives in
harmony with their understanding of the realities of life. The concept of ultimate reality is so
profound that its reflection and contemplation continuously propels a
re-evaluation of preconceived religious and ethical value systems. Preconceived value systems begin to pale in
the light of ultimate reality resulting in lives full of love, understanding,
peace and harmony.
How an individual behaves in life depends upon how he
perceives himself. Does the individual
identify him/herself with the physical body alone without any sense of
oneness? Or does he/she identify with
the inner being without any sense of oneness?
Or does he/she identify him/herself with the Holy Spirit also without
which either the inner or the outer physical system cannot survive? Remember, the Holy Spirit is one of the
uncreated Persons identical with Godhead, the ultimate reality (Eckhart 1981,
p. 96). Am I a separate individual cut
off from others? Or am I connected with
others through the sense of oneness of material, mental and causal
principles? Body identification
encourages a finite, separate and disjointed view of life. So is the case with identification with the
inner beings of intellect, ego and mind.
Balanced perspectives of self lead to balanced lives and lopsided perspectives
to lopsided lives. The profundity and
depth of the concept of ultimate reality and meaning has the capacity of
providing the tools necessary for humanity to attenuate the effect of
preconceived ideas while developing the balance needed for harmonious lives.
It is a matter of common perception that nature is imbued
with dynamism. Principles of being and
becoming are the forces that propel this dynamism. The former principle in one sense relates with the element of
constancy in what we are, we were, and continue to be and in the other sense it
relates with what we have become at a given instant in time. The latter principle relates with the
element of change in what we are going to be.
Natural entities simultaneously have a certain state of being and also a
certain tendency of becoming somewhat different. Without this tendency of becoming, there would be no creativity
in nature and there will be no dynamism; everything would be totally static and
lifeless.
The
element of constancy is manifest through the principle of life or consciousness
enabling the capacities of life and perception, thought, feeling and will in
the mind stuff. The dynamism seen in
nature is driven by this principle. On
the other hand, the element of change is manifest through the objects of
perception, thought and feeling expressed through matter, subtle or gross. The medium of change is this principle of
becoming. The mechanism of change is
pure and simple determinism through cause and effect characteristic in the
material domain whereas both free will and determinism play a part in the
dynamism seen in nature.
Matter, at the level of common experience, displays the
tendency of becoming in primarily a deterministic manner, because it lacks
effective mental equipment necessary for the manifestation of
consciousness. Living organisms are
endowed with physical bodies that permit their mental functions to interact
with each other and with the principle of consciousness. They, on the other hand, display a degree of
free will mixed in with determinism.
In the cases of both inanimate matter and of living
organisms, dynamism appears to be guided by a principle of consciousness or
intelligence, which is present in them both, although it is perceptible to a
higher degree in living organisms than in inanimate matter. The extent to which an object manifests the
principle of consciousness seems to depend upon its individual spiritual state
manifest through the effectiveness of mental equipment. Thus, in the real world, the principle of
consciousness, to the extent it is manifest, gives rise to free will, which
alters the deterministic course of natural tendencies.
This principle of consciousness is responsible for
enabling awareness to the subject’s own state of existence in relation with
that of the environment. The extent of
this self-awareness depends upon the extent to which the subject manifests the
principle of consciousness. Subjects
with high degree of awareness display a relatively high degree of free will
that alters the natural deterministic path of evolution. In inanimate matter, there appears to be
little or no free will, and the process of becoming proceeds in a relatively
predictable and deterministic manner.
Within the class of living organisms, the principle of consciousness is
manifest to different degrees in different organisms. Of all the living organisms, human beings manifest it the most,
although not to the same extent individually.
Therefore, of all the living organisms, in humankind the dynamic
processes are capable of the highest degree of freedom from the determinism of
natural inclinations. It is important
to make it clear that the term free will is used in this article to mean will
free from the compulsions of natural instincts and inclinations resulting from
the unconscious or subconscious mind, prior experience, karma,
preconceived ideas, habits, prior conditioning, etc.
The extent to which the principle of consciousness is
manifest in a subject determines the extent of its spiritual development. The extent of spiritual growth thus can be
measured by the degree of freedom from the determinism of natural instincts and
inclinations.
Development of human beings depends upon the extent to which
the principle of consciousness is manifest in them. This presumably is the assumption implicit in the systematic
development of human awareness by educational processes, which, by definition,
aim at an accelerated rate of human development as compared with the rate
envisaged by nature alone. The extent
to which the educational processes succeed in the spiritual development of the
student can therefore be measured by the degree of resultant freedom from
natural instincts and inclinations.
The current educational systems seem to be designed to
emphasize human awareness of the external environment rather than the awareness
of the essence of one’s own existence.
It is believed that this lack of self-awareness leads to a one-sided
development of human awareness skewing the path of spiritual development. Our educational systems prepare us more for
the business, scientific and technological developments and less for the realms
of understanding our own human essence and that of the universe. Who are we?
What are we? Where do we come
from? Where does the universe come
from? Why are we here? How do we relate to one another and how do
we relate to the universe? How do we
come about and how does the universe come about? How should we behave with one another and how should we behave in
the universe where we exist?
Educational systems do not lay enough emphasis on questions such as these
and most of humanity is left to answer these questions using individual resources
or by chance discoveries. Such a lack
of systematic preparedness in matters of human essence and essence of the
universe leaves us without proper perspective in making free life choices. We seem to be governed by natural
tendencies, which seem to drive us rather than our free will. If education were to cause spiritual
development in step with developments in the external world, it is imperative
to strike a balance in the emphasis on matters of essence relative to external
environment.
Evidence of this lack of balance is present
everywhere. In this post-modern era,
the human mind is capable of developing space and air travel, computers, smart
machines, the internet, human clones, lightening-fast communications, rapid
means of transportation, health and disease control, etc. In comparison, there is no discernible
improvement in inner human condition that underlies behavior, minimal standards
of behavior being enforced from outside through laws, legislation or
reciprocity of selfish individual, national or regional interests.
Unchecked passions seem to take control. Pleasure-seeking through sex, alcohol and
drugs, seems to be commonplace. Family
commitments weaken. Love, respect, and
compassion generally seem to be absent or lacking. Violence is commonplace.
Emphasis on sex and pornography is alarming. Pleasure seeking by individuals seems to replace noble goals of
life. As a consequence, loneliness and
depression seem to increase and mental health seems to deteriorate as we have
more external facilities with increased technological development.
Hatred and lack of tolerance abound. Shortsighted profit motive and greed drive
everything. Environment is being
polluted to the extent that the very life on earth is threatened by climate
change and ozone depletion. Weapons of
genocide and mass destruction are so numerous that the whole population of the
earth can be destroyed many times over.
Humankind seems to be rushing towards hatred, violence and destruction
without looking back. In general, we
seem to lack the internal human tools to deal with changes in lifestyle brought
about by increased development in the sphere of external environment. On the other hand, in the less developed
parts of the world, comparisons with the developed parts have generated
feelings of injustice and despair leading to loss of hope and growth of
radicalism and extremism. Intolerance,
hatred, and acts of terrorism have sent shockwaves around the world. Humankind seems to be in a state of
turmoil. Peace, both individual and
collective, seems illusive. Fear and
greed appear to have taken humanity in a tight grip.
It is my understanding that in North America more Internet
traffic is generated by each of the pornographic and gambling businesses than
by any other human endeavor.
Considering that North America is a developed region of the world with
free and compulsory education until high school, one can imagine how this would
be used in geographical areas of the world with little literacy, development,
or education. Internet is a
technological development with unlimited potential of human good. But look at the human condition that has
reduced it to be a tool of slavery to baser instincts rather than a tool of
freedom from slavery from natural instincts and inclinations!
Admittedly, leadership of some of the so-called developed
nations has taken seemingly important spiritually progressive steps in the form
of legislation guaranteeing basic human dignity and rights to their citizens,
but lacking accompanying spiritual growth of the individual citizen,
legislation remains ineffective especially in situations involving conflict
with the houses of power. On an
international level, human rights considerations remain subservient to national
interests or absolutist visions of religious leaders in-charge of interpreting
God or God made laws. Of course, there
are instances of enlightened leadership on international level through acts of
removal of walls, boundaries and barriers, but again such acts are largely
driven by national and regional interests rather than spiritual or human
considerations. On an individual level,
humanity seems to be drawn towards pleasure seeking either here on earth or in
heaven after death, mistaking momentary pleasure for lasting happiness and
incapable of managing personal relationships, the environment and individual
lives. We value pleasure to an extent
that we are willing to go to heaven to enjoy earthly pleasures. Leadership of nations cannot be essentially
different from the individual citizens from whom it is drawn.
The root of human condition is traceable to our complete
identification with physical body and intellect, which simply are expressions
of the created principles. We are
conscious of the finitude of our bodies and mental capabilities. This happens because of our misunderstanding
of our true source; we truly are expressions of ultimate reality, which is
infinite.
I am an expression of ultimate reality and so are
you. I was born with that identity but
I was not aware of it. My mother told
me I was her son. Then my father told
me I was his son. A little while later
everybody told me I was a Hindu, and then I was an Indian. Later I became a Canadian. In my old age, I am known as the husband of
somebody and the father of so and so. I
am aware of all those identities and in this confusion I failed to realize that
at first I was an expression of ultimate reality. This is my most basic and supreme identity. I could not have any of those identities if
I ultimate reality chose not to manifest in my form or create me. All other identities came afterwards.
Our cause is infinite therefore we too are infinite. Our source is the source of the entire
universe. We are all are akin, connected,
united and one. I inherit my being from
ultimate reality and so do you and all the others. Whereas the created principles are our material cause, the
efficient cause is the Holy Spirit without recognition of which we have limited
tools to transcend our body and sense related selfishness. An enlightened perspective between the body
and the spirit is needed for leading a balanced life. Without this perspective, one’s behavior is likely to be governed
by one’s limited I-sense – natural instincts, a collection of preconceived
ideas, a limited set of experiences and the consequent inclinations. With this I-sense, there is no scope for
free will. Our lives are going with the
flow of unchecked emotions and ungoverned passions. One’s behavior then is totally deterministic and governed by the
strict laws of cause and effect. To
every action, there is a proportionate reaction.
Inclinations lead to strong cravings, aversions, and a
strong desire to live with consequent fear of dying. All actions then are governed by these determinants of human
condition.
Our false identification with our body and intellect is
the source of exclusivity. What we say,
think or believe becomes the only truth.
If we are right, everybody else must be wrong. We are at the center of our body and intellect centered lives,
next come our spouses and immediate families that feed our senses, then every
thing connected with us. Things
unconnected with our immediate circle are either of no concern to us; they must
not be right; or downright despicable.
Whether such people are religious or not, educated or not, whether they
go to church, synagogue, temple, or mosque it does not make an iota of
difference to their attitude about others.
Human history shows that people who identify their selves
with ultimate reality have an inclusive view of others. They see all beings in the universe as one
family. They understand humanity as they
understand themselves. Their viewpoint
is inclusive of not only all humanity, but also of all other beings in the
universe. Such people may be very
dedicated to their respective religion and their particular ways of seeking
personal salvation or liberation; they see nothing wrong with having love and
respect for others. For them religions
are nothing but different paths to knowledge and love of ultimate reality; and
one can only walk one path at a time.
All the paths, whether prescribed or self-designed, when followed with
devotion and single mindedness are equally capable of taking the dedicated to
their destinations. One can only be
inclusive to the extent one identifies oneself with ultimate reality.
All beings are born with natural instincts of likes and
dislikes, cravings and aversions. As a
consequence, we all feel attracted towards and attached to an object or idea
that we imagine pleases us, and feel a degree of resentment, loathing and
repulsion towards an object or idea that we imagine upsets us, displeases us, or causes us some kind of pain. The natural cravings and aversions give rise
to distaste, loathing, repugnance, hatred, and fear on one side and longing,
hunger, hankering, passion and greed on the other as we live and learn from our
individual environments.
These instincts and inclinations form a group of
individual passions, which tend to enslave human beings. Under their spell, human behavior is totally
deterministic and free will does not play a role. Spiritual development enables freedom from passions by strengthening
the element of free will that results from the understanding of human essence,
essence of the universe and their relationship – considerations that remind me
of my most basic and supreme identity that I am an expression of ultimate
reality; so are you and all the others.
This identity liberates a person from the cause and effect
determinism. The extent to which one
identifies with ultimate reality is the measure of spiritual growth.
The answer to all this lies not in the denial of
attractions and repulsions, not in the dulling of senses, and definitely not in
unchecked indulgence in cravings and aversions. Freedom from passions does not imply a life devoid of pleasure
and enjoyment. Freedom implies
control. The person should be in
control. Passions should not control
the person, especially in critical situations.
Gift of life is meant to be lived fully. That is why we are here.
It is a question of maintaining proper perspective and being responsible
for one’s actions motivated by one’s passions.
One must remember that life is a balancing act. Purpose of food is to sustain life. But unchecked gluttony can lead to death. We have evidence of it all around in North
America. In the same manner, oxygen
without which we cannot survive even for a few minutes can kill us by oxidation
creating toxic free radicals damaging vital organs leading to death.
Self-consciousness, self study, and understanding of inner
motivations and drives is necessary for developing the mental tools of free
will to tame the ferocity of the human passions. Human beings need to develop inner tools of looking at the
reasons that underlie attractions, attachments, aversions and repulsions and
learn how to manage them with an enlightened perspective and the supreme
identity with the ultimate.
One adds to the natural cravings and aversions by learning
from the environment in which one lives.
They underlie all our activity.
One must use reason to control the natural and acquired passions or else
they start controlling our reason, thought and will. Control begins with understanding, which, in turn, leads to the
attenuation of passions.
“An unexamined life is not worth living.” We have to learn how to examine our
lives. We have to learn how to develop
valid tools of soul searching and examination of the drivers of our individual
will. Superlative happiness lies in the
activity of this examination and following up of the findings thereof. This is not a one-time activity, nor is it
an activity in which to involve in a haphazard and sporadic manner. On the contrary, it is a serious activity
that needs to be performed well, with due preparedness and understanding, and
continually if happiness is to be a continuous state of being in a life lived
well. In the opinion of the author,
education specifically designed for this purpose is necessary to achieve the
necessary goals of inner development, or in this fast changing world, the
natural force of becoming will continue to be directed by uncontrolled passions
and external considerations.
Although humanity recognizes the value of education in
orienting human lives, so far education in the spiritual heritage of humanity
has been overlooked. Having identified
human condition with material well-being, human societies have not paid due
attention to the deeper determinants of human condition. This article proposes a program of
complementary education in the hope of re-establishing a balance between
internal and external growth of human awareness. The proposal does not de-emphasize the external but it emphasizes
the internal so that humankind attends to the task of developing inner tools of
coping with external developments in human and humane ways.
The proposed educational effort provides for an increased
emphasis on developing awareness of one’s own state of existence to correct the
imbalance created by the current educational systems. In this sense, spiritual heritage implies that knowledge and
understanding which is developed by humankind through the ages and is related
with the essence of human existence, essence of the universe, their
relationship with each other and the questions of human identity. It is hoped that such an education will
contribute to improving human condition in a deeper sense in general by
encouraging research and reflection on important human questions. In addition, it is hoped that this education
will also build inclusivity between religions on one hand and religion and
science on the other in addition to promoting respect for human and natural
environment. It is also hoped that such
an educational effort will promote tolerance, understanding, love and respect
amongst different people by creating a background for meaningful inter-religious
dialogue, as religion primarily is a mere cultural expression of the underlying
spiritual heritage of humanity.
In this
section, an attempt is made to develop a set of criteria that must be followed
in order to ensure acceptability of the proposed initiative, to define its
scope and its basic directions, and to develop a strategy of its
introduction. A curriculum of courses
can then be designed to suit the specific needs of the target students.
In seeking to
promote the proposed educational initiative, we must follow a certain set of
principles and adhere to a certain set of criteria. It must be remembered at all times that it is not intention to
meddle with religion as such or propose an alternative. It simply seeks to highlight the universality
of the essence of all religions. It
respects all religions as different paths of perceiving cosmic reality. The goals of mutual respect, love,
understanding and rich coexistence would be well served only when it does not
shake a seeker’s faith in his or her particular religion. We need to work on the principle that one’s
personal salvation or liberation lies in the single-minded pursuit of one’s
chosen path and, reciprocally, according the same freedom of choice to
others. The important conclusion of
spiritual endeavor is that it is senseless to bring in the element of
exclusivity in one’s religion while downgrading others. This conclusion needs further elaboration
because what is advocated here is not merely tolerance of other religions but
mutual respect and acceptance of other religions. This can be ensured only when
there is no seed of intolerance at all in the pursuit of a religion. It is true that civilized secular societies
have ensured that there are constitutional mechanisms in place where there is
no scope for religious intolerance to raise its ugly head. But our objectives go one step further. What
is advocated is true spirituality that transcends all religious differences and
where there is no room for religious intolerance per se.
The following design criteria shall apply to curriculum
research, development and delivery:
1.
All educational material, lectures, seminars, etc. will
be equally applicable to the whole humanity, irrespective of religion, belief,
faith and culture, and without discrimination of any kind whatsoever.
2.
All educational material, lectures, seminars, etc. will
use extreme caution and sensitivity and refrain from affirming, diminishing, or denying
any religion, belief, faith or culture explicitly or implicitly.
3.
All educational material, lectures, seminars, etc. will
acknowledge due academic credits to ideas and concepts used from any religion, belief, faith, or
culture.
4.
The approach used to research, develop and deliver the
curricula shall be based strictly on academic considerations.
5.
There shall be absolutely no preaching and proselytising.
6. All
educational material, lectures, seminars, etc. will promote tolerance,
understanding, love, and respect for all human beings without any
discrimination.
7. The
educational material will be complementary to the existing educational systems.
8. The
educational material will incorporate totality of human experience with
multi-disciplinary approach.
9. All
educational material, lectures, seminars, etc. will be mindful of the
individual need and right to the exclusive practice of one’s chosen religion
with undivided devotion and surrender in following the path of one’s personal
salvation or liberation. Religious
inclusivity should not in any way or form be understood as a compromise in this
respect.
10. The educational
material will promote the use of natural and environmental resources with
respect and responsibility.
11. The educational
material will promote positive personal involvement in improving human
condition through oneness, education, nonviolence, understanding, respect,
love, and service.
We are conscious of our existence and the existence of the
whole universe. We do not need any
other proof of our existence. We wonder
how we came about and how the universe in which we exist comes about. This natural curiosity leads to a belief or
an inference about the existence of an ultimate reality. We do not agree with
each other regarding the nature of this causal reality and how we, and the
universe come about through it. Some of
us are not convinced that there is a causal reality different from the
universe. The universe just is and it
goes on by itself indefinitely. Some of
us are not curious about the causal issues and we just want to live our lives
with contemplative guidance from within.
Some of us just want to live as we see fit depending upon the conditions
that prevail from time to time.
The proposal is
based on the following postulates:
- The existence of an individual in the universe
is a reality.
- The proof of existence lies in the
individual being having consciousness of the self and of the universe.
- There is underlying reality conceived as
ultimate reality not necessarily outside of the universe. This reality may be a reality of faith,
pure reason, contemplative perception, or a combination thereof.
- Understanding of the nature of this
other reality is relative and private to an individual and his/her
personal value and religious commitment.
- One can learn
to be exclusive in following one’s own commitment in search of personal
salvation or liberation and at the same time to be inclusive in respecting
everybody else’s religions.
Spirit of
something is its essence, its true reality, and its underlying meaning. It is proposed that we keep our focus on
this meaning while considering how to define the spiritual heritage of
humankind. Broadly speaking, the
spiritual heritage of humanity for our purpose would imply that body of
knowledge which is created by humankind anywhere in the world concerning human
identity arising out of an intelligibility of human essence, the essence of the
universe, the reality underlying humanity and the universe, the relationship
between realities of the humankind and that of the universe, the meaning and
purpose of being human in the universe, and the means of fulfillment of our
purpose. Courses shall include both the
cognitive and the experiential, direct and the indirect knowledge of ultimate
reality harmonizing with different disciplines of the established educational
system.
The
consideration of human essence encompasses it actuality, its potential, and its
development. The study includes the
essence of body, mind and spirit. In
principle, body and mind have been identified with the created principles of
earth and heaven respectively, and spirit with the uncreated Holy Spirit, also
referred to as the real self. Whereas
the real self is the subject of conative knowledge alone, body is the subject
of life sciences, and mind including the study of reason, thought, will,
senses, feelings and sensations etc. are the subjects of humanities and social
sciences.
Human identity underlies human condition. Intelligibility, attenuation and control of human condition to
achieve universal inclusivity is the main goal of education in the spiritual
heritage of humanity and a yardstick of one’s spiritual development.
This curriculum area encompasses the exploration of how
different religions, beliefs, faiths, cultures, and natural sciences conceive
ultimate reality of the universe and humanity within it.
A reflection
of the self, the universe and the relationship between the two leads to an
understanding of the meaning and purpose of life. Spiritual education won’t be complete without this investigation
including the disciplines of contemplation and ways of living.
It is suggested that initially a curriculum be designed to
suit students at the post secondary level in order to develop a pool of
teachers for the lower grades. Because
of the breadth of the scope of the proposed initiative, it is suggested that a
team of experts collaboratively develop each course.
Initially the courses will be offered in distance
education mode on the internet. It is hoped that the established educational
systems worldwide will feel compelled to take notice if we do an excellent job
of high academic standard in developing course material, which we plan to share
with others on request.
Recognizing the value of education in orienting life, this
article presents a philosophical argument in favor of an increased emphasis in
public education on developing inner capacity of humankind through the all
inclusive ultimate reality centered study of human essence, essence of the
universe, relationship between the two, and human identity. Knowledge is transformational and that of
ultimate reality is especially so. It
is hoped that the proposed educational initiative will equip the human mind
better to cope in a human way with the fast paced scientific and technological
changes in the external world. It is
also hoped that the resulting spiritual understanding will pave the way for
increased religious tolerance and understanding leading to mutual love and
respect amongst the various religions of the world and amongst diverse
inhabitants of open and secular societies.
It is hoped that the proposed spiritual studies will
contribute significantly towards promoting civilized behavior by individuals
and nations alike by equipping the individuals in the world with means of
intelligibility that imbibes unity and oneness of our essence with simultaneous
affirmation of their personal faith structures and denial or diminishing of
none. Peace and justice require the
capacity to see everyone inclusively.
Watts, Alan 1989.
The Way of Zen. New York:
Vintage Books
Berezin, Alexander A. 2002. Energy, Information, and
Emergence in the Context of Ultimate reality and Meaning. Ultimate
reality and Meaning. Vol. 25 No. 4
pp. 256-73.
Copplestone, F.C. 1955.
Aquinas. Baltimore, MD: Penguin.
De Mello, Anthony 1992.
Awareness. New York, NY: Doubleday.
Eckhart, Meister 1981. Meister Eckhart – The Essential Sermons,
Commentaries, Treatises, and Defense.
Translation and Introduction by Edmund Colledge and Bernard McGinn. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.
Felleman, Hazel 1936. Best Loved
Poems of American People. Garden City: Garden City Books.
Hume, Robert Ernest 1921. The Thirteen Principal
Upanishads. London: Oxford University Press.
Prabhavananda, Swami. The Upanishads. Madras: Sri Ramakrishna
Math.
Ranganatharanda, Swami
1993. The Message of the
Upanisads. Mumbai: Bhartiya Vidya
Bhavan.
Sivananda, Swami 1999. Brahma
Sutras. Shivananda Nagar, U.P., India:
The Divine Life Society.
Taimni, I. K. 1961. The Science of Yoga. A commentary on
The Yoga Sutras of Patanjali. Wheaton, IL: The Theosophical Publishing House.
The Cloud of Unknowing 1981. Edited by James Walsh.
Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.
The Holy Bible Containing the Old and New Testaments: King
James Version 2000. National Publishing
Company.
The Noble Qur’an.
Madinah: King Fahd Complex for the Printing of the Holy Qur’an.
Soothill, W. E. 1923.
The Three Religions of China. London: Oxford University Press.
Talwar, S.D. 2001. Ultimate reality and Meaning of
Samkhya. Ultimate Reality and Meaning.
Vol. 24 No. 1 pp. 3-29.
Talwar, S.D. 2004. Yoga: Attainment of Ultimate Reality and
Meaning. Ultimate reality and Meaning.
Vol. 27 No. 1 pp. 3-28.